On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:49 +0530, hanifa.mohammed wrote: > 5.2. Generating a REGISTER Response > When generating the 200 (OK) response to the REGISTER request, the > procedures of step 8 of Section 10.3 of RFC 3261 [1] are followed. > Furthermore, for each Contact header field value placed in the > response, if the registrar has stored an instance ID associated with > that contact, that instance ID is returned as a Contact header field > parameter. > > The actual problem is that openIms server returns the public gruu value > in 2xx of Register > but without '+sip.instance' parameter. > Is this ok to proceed processing the GRUU parameters?
It appears that openIms is violating section 5.2, in that it returns the public gruu header parameter but not the +sip.instance header parameter. Since the response is incorrect, you have great freedom deciding how to process it. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
