Rajani, >Hi Shinji, > >Now i understood that > >UAC UAS > >1.INVITE ------------> >2. <------------407-INVITE >3.ACK---------------> > >4.INVITE-----------> (new INVITE sent after 407 challenge response) >5. < ---------------- 180 >6. <---------------- 200 >7 ------------------->ACK > >Credentials present in INVITE from step 4 and ACK in step 7 must be >same. >Hope it's correct?
Correct. Just to be sure the credential of 1 is different from the one of 4. Regards, Shinji >Thanks, >Rajani > > >OKUMURA Shinji wrote: >> Rajani, >> >> The sentence is relevant only to 2xx to INVITE. >> And basically an ACK a UAS receives is sent by a proxy. >> A proxy will have no credential. >> That is, the ACK need not have a credential. >> >> Regards, >> Shinji >> >> "rajanikanth.ha" <[email protected]> >> Wed, 26 May 2010 11:06:56 +0530 >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Can anybody please suggest me how to check the following >>> requirement of >>> RFC3261: >>> >>> In section 13.2.2.4 2xx Responses of RFC3261 >>> The ACK MUST contain the same credentials as the INVITE. >>> >>> UAC UAS >>> >>> 1.INVITE ------------> >>> 2. <------------407-INVITE >>> 3.ACK---------------> >>> >>> Do i have to check credentials in the ACK message sent in the step >>> 3 >>> with that of INVITE request sent in step1? >>> Is it correct? >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Rajani >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip-implementors mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >Sip-implementors mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
