Hi,
No we can't treat this as malformed message, because its a valid
message.
for more info go through RFC 4566 and RFC 3264
Regards,
Praveen
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 9:44 PM, anand madhab <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Can we treat this as malformed message ?
>
> Regards,
> Anand
>
> On 9/26/10, praveena ss <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > See my inline comments.
> > Regards,
> > Praveen
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:06 AM, anand madhab <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, I have another query which i am not able to find out in RFC may be i
> >> have missed but if any one have any idea about please refer:
> >>
> >> My query is as per RFC we can have attribute line for session
> which
> >> will be above media line, and we can omit media line also as per
> >> RFC so
> >> a) Is it legal to put only attribute line for session without any
> >> media line ? [Praveen: yes its legal but meaningless say for example you
> >> can use bandwidth attributes/direction attributes in session without
> media
> >> line but its meaningless]
> >>
> >> b) In this case if we put attribute for media without without
> media
> >> line in stead of session attribute, what should be the response ?
> >> [Praveen:the UAS or responder will ignore the attributes and give
> response
> >> without media line]
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thanks & Regards
> >> Anand Madhab
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sip-implementors mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Anand Madhab
> 9686620467
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
