Hi, Can we treat this as malformed message ? Regards, Anand
On 9/26/10, praveena ss <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > See my inline comments. > Regards, > Praveen > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:06 AM, anand madhab <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, I have another query which i am not able to find out in RFC may be i >> have missed but if any one have any idea about please refer: >> >> My query is as per RFC we can have attribute line for session which >> will be above media line, and we can omit media line also as per >> RFC so >> a) Is it legal to put only attribute line for session without any >> media line ? [Praveen: yes its legal but meaningless say for example you >> can use bandwidth attributes/direction attributes in session without media >> line but its meaningless] >> >> b) In this case if we put attribute for media without without media >> line in stead of session attribute, what should be the response ? >> [Praveen:the UAS or responder will ignore the attributes and give response >> without media line] >> >> -- >> Thanks & Regards >> Anand Madhab >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip-implementors mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors >> > -- Thanks & Regards Anand Madhab 9686620467 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
