Hi Siga, Could you show your INVITE and 401 Unauthorized messages.
*Cheers* [?], Pranav Damele *+41-766-099-288* On 22 March 2011 14:12, <[email protected]>wrote: > Send Sip-implementors mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Sip-implementors digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Ftag Parameter in Record-Route (Nitin Kapoor) > 2. Re: Ftag Parameter in Record-Route (Attila Sipos) > 3. 401 Unauthorized message! (Siga) > 4. Ftag Parameter in Record-Route (Nitin Kapoor) > 5. Re: Ftag Parameter in Record-Route (Kevin P. Fleming) > 6. Re: 401 Unauthorized message! (Uttam Sarkar (usarkar)) > 7. Re: 401 Unauthorized message! (Siga) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:20:53 -0400 > From: Nitin Kapoor <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Ftag Parameter in Record-Route > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Dear All, > > Could anyone please help me out on this. > > Thanks, > Nitin > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Nitin Kapoor <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > i am facing the problem with one of my customer where i noticed that > > Record-Route header containing the "ftag" parameter. > > > > INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0 > > Record-Route: > > > <sip:79.99.193.141;lr;ftag=4F6C3030343338350007D3E5;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--;vst=AAAAAHQEBAMFAAUABwZzAg0deQ4XHwAKAAAKCy4xNDE-;did=9b.dcc08423> > > Content-Type:application/sdp > > To:sip:[email protected] > > From:sip:[email protected] > > ;cpc=ordinary;tag=4F6C3030343338350007D3E5 > > Privacy:none > > P-Asserted-Identity:sip:[email protected];cpc=ordinary > > Supported:100rel,timer > > Expires:120 > > Date:Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:02:01 GMT > > Session-Expires:3600 > > Min-SE:90 > > Call-ID:01FF945D4C81400000054AC4@TB004385_VOIP0 > > CSeq:1 INVITE > > Route:<sip:79.99.193.141:5060;lr;transport=udp> > > Max-Forwards:69 > > Timestamp:512997 > > User-Agent:TB004385 > > Contact:sip:[email protected]:5061 > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 79.99.193.141;branch=z9hG4bK1f07.16311b13.0 > > Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 79.99.193.138:5060 > > > ;received=79.99.193.138;branch=z9hG4bKDD5A2E7439308FCEA1D45366471A437C;rport=5060 > > Content-Length:344 > > > > Now above is my INVITE which is coming from UAC to SBC and my SBC is > > sending 400 Bad Request to UAC. My doubt is that FTAG is containing the > > invalid correct hence SBC is unable to understand the nature of this > invite > > hence sending the 400. > > > > Could anyone please help me out to understand this? also is there any > limit > > for the character in FTAG? > > > > Thanks, > > Nitin Kapoor > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:56:19 -0000 > From: "Attila Sipos" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Ftag Parameter in Record-Route > To: "Nitin Kapoor" <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Record-Route headers often have opaque parameters which are > not in any draft or RFC. Such parameters have no meaning except > to the entity which added them. > > For Record-Route all you have to do is reflect the route back. > When you use the learnt route in a Route header you have to > quote the full learnt route including all its parameters. > As long as the parameters follow the general grammar rules, > it should not matter what is the content. > > So in the case of the ftag, it looks legal and should be used as > is supplied (along with the rest of the route information). > So, your SBC should not be rejecting it due to the ftag header. > If it does, the SBC is behaving wrongly. > > (When I get a problem like this I often strip out the suspect > header and try to send the message using something like SIPP > to see if the message is still rejected) > > Regards > > Attila > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] on behalf of Nitin > Kapoor > Sent: Tue 22/03/2011 00:20 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Ftag Parameter in Record-Route > > Dear All, > > Could anyone please help me out on this. > > Thanks, > Nitin > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Nitin Kapoor <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > i am facing the problem with one of my customer where i noticed that > > Record-Route header containing the "ftag" parameter. > > > > INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0 > > Record-Route: > > > <sip:79.99.193.141;lr;ftag=4F6C3030343338350007D3E5;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--;vst=AAAAAHQEBAMFAAUABwZzAg0deQ4XHwAKAAAKCy4xNDE-;did=9b.dcc08423> > > Content-Type:application/sdp > > To:sip:[email protected] > > From:sip:[email protected] > > ;cpc=ordinary;tag=4F6C3030343338350007D3E5 > > Privacy:none > > P-Asserted-Identity:sip:[email protected];cpc=ordinary > > Supported:100rel,timer > > Expires:120 > > Date:Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:02:01 GMT > > Session-Expires:3600 > > Min-SE:90 > > Call-ID:01FF945D4C81400000054AC4@TB004385_VOIP0 > > CSeq:1 INVITE > > Route:<sip:79.99.193.141:5060;lr;transport=udp> > > Max-Forwards:69 > > Timestamp:512997 > > User-Agent:TB004385 > > Contact:sip:[email protected]:5061 > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 79.99.193.141;branch=z9hG4bK1f07.16311b13.0 > > Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 79.99.193.138:5060 > > > ;received=79.99.193.138;branch=z9hG4bKDD5A2E7439308FCEA1D45366471A437C;rport=5060 > > Content-Length:344 > > > > Now above is my INVITE which is coming from UAC to SBC and my SBC is > > sending 400 Bad Request to UAC. My doubt is that FTAG is containing the > > invalid correct hence SBC is unable to understand the nature of this > invite > > hence sending the 400. > > > > Could anyone please help me out to understand this? also is there any > limit > > for the character in FTAG? > > > > Thanks, > > Nitin Kapoor > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:05:53 +0100 > From: Siga <[email protected]> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] 401 Unauthorized message! > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > I have been developing my SIP Client on a embedded system and I used > Trixbox > to act as a SIP Server. The transactions from my SIP Client to the Trixbox > SIP Server were something like this as shown below......... > > > SIP Client > Trixbox(Server) > > INVITE > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > 100 Trying > > <--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 200 OK > > <--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ACK > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > MEDIA SESSION (RTP) > > <---------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > BYE > > <--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Now I planned to go a step ahead and planned to establish a connection to a > soft-phone in my case I chose X-Lite. I added an extension for the X-Lite > in > my Trixbox so that the account for X-Lite is enabled. On the other hand > when I try to connect my SIP Client with X-Lite, as soon as it receives > INVITE from SIP Client, the X-Lite sends 401 Unauthorized message. Once i > get this 401 message I again retransmit a re-Invite message back to the > X-Lite but still it sends me 401 message. > > Can somebody let me know what is going on with my transactions here. > > Regards > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:14:34 -0400 > From: Nitin Kapoor <[email protected]> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Ftag Parameter in Record-Route > To: [email protected], > [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Dear All, > > i am facing the problem with one of my customer where i noticed that > Record-Route header containing the "ftag" parameter. > > INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0 > Record-Route: > > <sip:79.99.193.141;lr;ftag=4F6C3030343338350007D3E5;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--;vst=AAAAAHQEBAMFAAUABwZzAg0deQ4XHwAKAAAKCy4xNDE-;did=9b.dcc08423> > Content-Type:application/sdp > To:sip:[email protected] > From:sip:[email protected] > ;cpc=ordinary;tag=4F6C3030343338350007D3E5 > Privacy:none > P-Asserted-Identity:sip:[email protected];cpc=ordinary > Supported:100rel,timer > Expires:120 > Date:Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:02:01 GMT > Session-Expires:3600 > Min-SE:90 > Call-ID:01FF945D4C81400000054AC4@TB004385_VOIP0 > CSeq:1 INVITE > Route:<sip:79.99.193.141:5060;lr;transport=udp> > Max-Forwards:69 > Timestamp:512997 > User-Agent:TB004385 > Contact:sip:[email protected]:5061 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 79.99.193.141;branch=z9hG4bK1f07.16311b13.0 > Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 79.99.193.138:5060 > > ;received=79.99.193.138;branch=z9hG4bKDD5A2E7439308FCEA1D45366471A437C;rport=5060 > Content-Length:344 > > Now above is my INVITE which is coming from UAC to SBC and my SBC is > sending > 400 Bad Request to UAC. My doubt is that FTAG is containing the invalid > correct hence SBC is unable to understand the nature of this invite hence > sending the 400. > > Could anyone please help me out to understand this? also is there any limit > for the character in FTAG? > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:21:37 -0500 > From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Ftag Parameter in Record-Route > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 03/22/2011 07:14 AM, Nitin Kapoor wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > i am facing the problem with one of my customer where i noticed that > > Record-Route header containing the "ftag" parameter. > > You already asked this question and received an answer. > > -- > Kevin P. Fleming > Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies > Jabber: [email protected] | SIP: [email protected] | Skype: kpfleming > 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA > Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:35:19 -0500 > From: "Uttam Sarkar (usarkar)" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 401 Unauthorized message! > To: "Siga" <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Please check you X-Lite configuration. It must have been configure with > required authentication. > So, your client must send INVITE with credentials to overcome 401 > response. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Siga > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:06 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] 401 Unauthorized message! > > Hi, > I have been developing my SIP Client on a embedded system and I used > Trixbox > to act as a SIP Server. The transactions from my SIP Client to the > Trixbox > SIP Server were something like this as shown below......... > > > SIP Client > Trixbox(Server) > > INVITE > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------> > > 100 Trying > <----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > > 200 OK > <----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > > ACK > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------> > > MEDIA SESSION (RTP) > <----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------> > > BYE > <----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > > > Now I planned to go a step ahead and planned to establish a connection > to a > soft-phone in my case I chose X-Lite. I added an extension for the > X-Lite in > my Trixbox so that the account for X-Lite is enabled. On the other hand > when I try to connect my SIP Client with X-Lite, as soon as it receives > INVITE from SIP Client, the X-Lite sends 401 Unauthorized message. Once > i > get this 401 message I again retransmit a re-Invite message back to the > X-Lite but still it sends me 401 message. > > Can somebody let me know what is going on with my transactions here. > > Regards > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:12:09 +0100 > From: Siga <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 401 Unauthorized message! > To: "Uttam Sarkar (usarkar)" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I partly understood your answer. Can you please elaborate this may be with > an example or some link on the internet where I can follow. > Regards > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Uttam Sarkar (usarkar) > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Please check you X-Lite configuration. It must have been configure with > > required authentication. > > So, your client must send INVITE with credentials to overcome 401 > > response. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Siga > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:06 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [Sip-implementors] 401 Unauthorized message! > > > > Hi, > > I have been developing my SIP Client on a embedded system and I used > > Trixbox > > to act as a SIP Server. The transactions from my SIP Client to the > > Trixbox > > SIP Server were something like this as shown below......... > > > > > > SIP Client > > Trixbox(Server) > > > > INVITE > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ---------> > > > > 100 Trying > > <----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------- > > > > 200 OK > > <----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------- > > > > ACK > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ---------> > > > > MEDIA SESSION (RTP) > > <----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----------> > > > > BYE > > <----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------- > > > > > > Now I planned to go a step ahead and planned to establish a connection > > to a > > soft-phone in my case I chose X-Lite. I added an extension for the > > X-Lite in > > my Trixbox so that the account for X-Lite is enabled. On the other hand > > when I try to connect my SIP Client with X-Lite, as soon as it receives > > INVITE from SIP Client, the X-Lite sends 401 Unauthorized message. Once > > i > > get this 401 message I again retransmit a re-Invite message back to the > > X-Lite but still it sends me 401 message. > > > > Can somebody let me know what is going on with my transactions here. > > > > Regards > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > End of Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 96, Issue 28 > ************************************************ >
_______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
