On 04/26/2011 10:34 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > Dale, I do know how serial forking works. Serial forking makes sense > when the tryed branch fails due to a real "error" > (500/503/408/timeout...), but not on a 404. Of course, it could occur > that in a custom/specific scenario it makes sense to perform failover > upon receipt of a 404 but it's not usual in PSTN scenarios.
PSTN scenarios are "custom/specific" scenarios :-) I'm not aware of forking being used in 'PSTN scenarios' at all, really, since I've never heard of any PSTN feature that would fork a call. Even the 'call forward-no answer' and 'call forward-busy' features are implemented by the target endpoint's switch, not by the calling endpoint's switch. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: [email protected] | SIP: [email protected] | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
