2011/5/11 deepak bansal <[email protected]>: > was going through RFC 3261 and came through following line: > *"Usage of IPv6 multicast is not defined in this specification, and will be > a subject of future standardization when the need arises"* > ** > So If we receive: > > INVITE message and > via Header Contains: "maddr" field (in IPV6) > > How we should respond to that method. will there be any response to this > INVITE or will it be discarded.
I would reply: SIP/2.0 400 Please don't use stupid maddr and remove it from RFC 3261 -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
