11.05.2011 20:18, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2011/5/11 deepak bansal<[email protected]>: > >> was going through RFC 3261 and came through following line: >> *"Usage of IPv6 multicast is not defined in this specification, and will be >> a subject of future standardization when the need arises"* >> ** >> So If we receive: >> >> INVITE message and >> via Header Contains: "maddr" field (in IPV6) >> >> How we should respond to that method. will there be any response to this >> INVITE or will it be discarded. >> > > I would reply: > > SIP/2.0 400 Please don't use stupid maddr and remove it from RFC 3261 > >
Haha, +1. I don't even process it in my SIP code :) -- Regards, Evgeniy Khramtsov, ProcessOne. xmpp:[email protected]. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
