Cullen halted discussion within sip. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg26385.html
It started being discussed within apps-discuss; however I'm not sure if it resulted in any changes. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg00378.html > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sip- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz > Castillo > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 2:59 PM > To: Worley, Dale R (Dale) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] AbsoluteURI BNF grammar does not accept > IPv6 (when opaque-part) > > 2011/5/12 Worley, Dale R (Dale) <[email protected]>: > > Yes, there is (or was) an effort to fix the grammar. (I was asked to > provide some input.) > > > > Also, don't forget RFC 5954, "Essential Correction for IPv6 ABNF and > URI Comparison in RFC 3261". > > I already implement RFC 5954, but my question about AbsoluteURI is not > covered/fixed there. I have to read the links provided by Brett > (however I expected there should be a RFC with the new fixes rather > than just some mails in a maillist). > > Thanks. > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
