2011/6/11 Joegen E. Baclor <[email protected]>: > My point is, 16.10 has this implied by not mentioning that the response > context will change in state or not. Having not mentioned it, perhaps it > implies no change in state is the correct interpretation.
If the proxy should chante the server/client transaction state upon receipt of a CANCEL, then the future 487 will fail as would found a terminated client transaction in the proxy. > Being implied, > the reason is so vague (as to why) make it really easy to misinterpret > things. This probably triggered your very first question that opened this > thread. Perhaps a text amendment is in order. Yes, a mention in the draft about "proxy does not change its server and client transaction state when processing a CANCEL" would be nice. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
