On 08/11/2011 03:30 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2011/8/11 Saúl Ibarra Corretgé<[email protected]>: >> I've seen code 434 User Not Online being used many times, but I could not >> find any reference to where/if its standardized :-S > > That would be some ugly/limited vendor not understanding section > 21.4.18 in RFC 3261: > > 21.4.18 480 Temporarily Unavailable > > The callee's end system was contacted successfully but the callee is > currently unavailable (for example, is not logged in, logged in but > in a state that precludes communication with the callee, or has > activated the "do not disturb" feature) [...]
Based on what this says, a 480 response is not appropriate for the case where the AoR is not currently mapped to any Contact URIs (as the in the OP's query). If there are no Contact URIs registered for the AoR, then the "callee's end system" cannot have been "contacted successfully". -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: [email protected] | SIP: [email protected] | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
