Hello,

On 25.01.2013 19:23, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> On 1/25/13 7:40 AM, Dmitry Akindinov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 25.01.2013 16:22, Yaswanth Raparti wrote:
>>> Hi Brett,
>>>
>>> Actually, I gave some random URI to hide the original uri. The original SIP
>>> URI does not have any '%' . It was encoded though.
>>
>> If the Contact URI is syntactically correct and the proxy has inserted
>> itself as the Record-Route header, then you should not be concerned with
>> the Contact URI value and meaning.
>>
>> If the proxy did not insert itself into the dialog path using
>> Record-Route headers, then it has a problem.
>
> You say "you should not be concerned". That depends on what you want to
> do. It is true that such a setup will allow *this* dialog to continue.
> But it won't support anything that needs the contact, like transfer, etc.

True. I stand corrected. I forgot of those transfer scenarios. Sorry for 
possible confusion.

My point was that implementations often try to semantically process a 
SIP URI even when they need a syntactical check at most.

> The caller is required to provide a globally routable contact. If the
> "proxy" (actually it is an SBC) is replacing it, then it should be
> replacing it with one that still has the globally routable property.
> (Though it might not if it is trying to provide privacy and block
> callbacks.)
>
>       Thanks,
>       Paul
>
>>> *V YAswanth RAparti
>>> B.E Electrical and Electronics.
>>> *
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 January 2013 17:48, Brett Tate<[email protected]>   wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Thus the encrypted contact is either serving the intended
>>>>> purpose or the proxy may have a configuration or software
>>>>> issue.  Talk to the proxy vendor or service provider.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally if the provided Contact is accurate, the vendor is not
>>>> properly escaping the sip-uri per RFC 3261.
>>>>
>>>> For instance, they did not escape the first '%'.
>>>>
>>>> Contact:<sip:3ijk$%^&*@12.13.14.15:5060;encoded-parm=F$%^GH.VFGT1@ert4
>>>> #;ue-addr=pcsf-abcd.xyzgroup-000.example.com;transport=tcp>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Akindinov
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to