Hi Sampat,
1. I guess there is no problem with SBG node as timer value on SBG is
configured in way that it retransmit message
11 times . That's why SBG sending INVITE 11 times to Destination before
Timer B fires and then after timeout it
starts posting error response 504 (11 times again) to Source as ACK
not coming .
2. SBG not forwarding CANCEL to Destination as SBG never got even 100
trying from Destination so CANCEL cannot
be sent out from SBG .
3. Yes there is scope of improvement on SBG side ,it can stop
retransmitting INVITE to Destination after getting Cancel from Source and
should send 487 response to Source .
*Problem here seems to be with Source* : As its expected from Source to
gracefully send ACK for every final response .
Thanks & Regards
Ankur Bansal
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:08 AM, sampat patnaik <sam_e...@yahoo.co.in>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Greetings of the day!!!
>
>
> Can anyone help me on this ongoing issue.
>
> Regards
> Sampat
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: sampat patnaik <sam_e...@yahoo.co.in>
> To: Rupesh Mothe <rm0063...@techmahindra.com>; "
> sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <
> sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, 19 September 2013 11:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE
>
>
>
> Hi Rupesh,
>
> 1)Incase that case what is expected out of source node..i.e the SBG(proxy)
> must be expecting an ACK message to the error 504 sent..right?
> 2) second query would be why not this CANCEL message is forwarded to next
> hop i.e destination node .should the flow mentioned below be followed:
>
> SOURCE SBG(Proxy 1) DESTINATION
> | | |
> | INVITE F1
> | |
> |--------------->| INVITE F2 |
> | 100 F3 |--------------->|
> |<---------------| INVITE F4
> | |--------------> |
> INVITE F5
> | |--------------> |
> |
> | INVITE F6 |
> | --------------->|
> INVITE F7
> --------------->
> INVITE F8
> --------------->
> |
> | |
> | CANCEL F9 | |
> |--------------->| |
> | 200 F10 | |
> |<---------------| CANCEL F11 |
> | |--------------->|
> | | 200
> F12 |
> | |<---------------|
> | | |
> | | 487 F17 |
> | |<---------------|
> | | ACK F18 |
>
> | |--------------->|
> | | |
> | | |
> | | |
> | |
> |
> | | |
> | 487 F19 | |
> |<---------------| |
> | ACK F20 | |
> |--------------->| |
> |
> |
>
> 3) i would suspect that the INVITE in F11 message(trailing mail) is becoz
> the cancel request is not being sensed by the SBG and is busy
> in resending the REINVITE message to the destination(maximum 7 invites due
> to timer issue of 64*T1 i.e 32secs) .Also i thing the error
> 504 is populated because there is time out error generated after destn
> server failed to respond to 7th(F11) reinvite request and is
> flooded to sorce side expecting an ACK before ending the entire process.
>
> 4)what would have happened had there not been that F11 invite message?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards
> Sampat
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rupesh Mothe <rm0063...@techmahindra.com>
> To: sampat patnaik <sam_e...@yahoo.co.in>
> Sent: Thursday, 19 September 2013 11:28 PM
> Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE
>
>
> Hi Sampat-
>
> This is expected behaviour , 504 should get retransmitted no issues , you
> need to set the retransmit value in proxy to minimize the flooding
> Issue i am seeing here is the 11th INVITE getting transmitted from proxy ,
> once it sent 200OK for CANCEL it should not send retransmitted INVITE any
> more
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Rupesh Mothe | NPA | Tech Mahindra
> Mobile: +91 9960727012 , +233-263597627
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sampat patnaik [mailto:sam_e...@yahoo.co.in]
> Sent: 19 September 2013 23:21
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE
>
> Hi,
>
> I am currently facing an issue that as follows :..my question is why
> PROXY1 is unable to process the CANCEL message in this case.
>
> CASE: REMOTE NODE IS COMPLETELY DOWN and we need to understand why
> flooding of 504 sip error is happening towards source side while it is not
> responding withACK mesg
>
>
> SOURCE Proxy 1 REMOTE NODE
>
> | | |
> | INVITE F1 | |
> |--------------->| INVITE F2 |
> | 100 F3 |--------------->|
> |<---------------| INVITE F4
> | |--------------> |
> INVITE F5
>
> | |--------------> |
> | | INVITE F6 |
> | --------------->|
> INVITE F7
> --------------->
> INVITE
> F8
> --------------->
> | | |
> | CANCEL F9 | |
> |--------------->| |
> | 200 F10 | |
> |<---------------| INVITE F11 |
>
> | |--------------->|
> | | |
> | | |
> | 504 F19 | |
> |<---------------| |
>
> | 504 F20 | |
> |<---------------| |
> | 504 F21 | |
> |<------------- | |
> | | |
>
> | | |
>
>
>
> 504 message is sent 11 times from proxy to source..why this abnormal
> behavior?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Regards
> Sampat
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
> ============================================================================================================================Disclaimer:
> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
> confidential
> and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review the
> policy at <a href="http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html";>
> http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a> externally and <a href="
> http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html";>
> http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html</a> internally within
> Tech
> Mahindra.============================================================================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
