Hi,

I was discussing the timer value of 64*T1 only.Here from my UAC side we  had 
set a timer of T1=500.Therefore the 64*T1 comes out to be 
32sec.The initial INVITE message being sent at 15:51:00 and the timer expires 
at 15:51:32 .Since final response is coming at 15:52:00 ,my MSC i.e
UAC here is cancelling the end to end and probably sending the disconnect 
message to UE.

I think we need to analyze the timer expiry at PROXY side.Isnt it?




________________________________
 From: Brett Tate <br...@broadsoft.com>
To: sampat patnaik <sam_e...@yahoo.co.in>; 
"sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu" 
<sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu> 
Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2013 12:56 AM
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE
 

> In my case The original Invite Message has been sent 
> at 15:51:00 and CANCEL request sent at 15:51:16 from 
> UAC i.e(SOURCE) and is being acknoledged with 200 OK 
> at 15:51:16 by the PROXY. However the same PROXY is 
> sending the error SERVER TIMEOUT at 15:52:00  which 
> is more than the time(64*T1) specified/allowed to 
> respond to original INVITE request .

The mentioned 64*T1 time does not apply to the proxy/UAS.  That is the 
suggested time for the UAC which sent CANCEL to wait for INVITE transaction 
completion.


> So my question on TIMER expiry seems to be a valid one 
> as to why the SBG (PROXY) is not responding on time 
> (pls note that the time difference between 7th INVITE 
> and 504 Message is again 30secs.  Does the SBG takes 
> that much time to respond? 

You'd need to ask the vendor.  However based upon what you provided, it sounds 
like T1 might be configured to be around 1 second or Timer B is configured to 
be 60 seconds.


> What should be the time to respond to source indicating 
> the reason of time out?

>From a UAC perspective, you are aware of the recommended wait time.  From a 
>proxy perspective, it may or may not return the final response within the 
>interval expected by the UAC.  However as far as I know, RFC 3261 allows the 
>proxy to basically act as it wants concerning the topic since it doesn't 
>mandate that T1 be 500ms.  Thus, the reason why you are experiencing all of 
>the retries.
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to