If its not mentioned then logic will be left for user to implement

Regards
Pranav
On 22 Oct 2014 21:30, "Balint Menyhart" <balme...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> RFC 4566, just where c= lines are defined:
>
> 5.7. Connection Data ("c=")
>
>       c=<nettype> <addrtype> <connection-address>
>
>    The "c=" field contains connection data.
>
>    A session description MUST contain either at least one "c=" field in
>    each media description or a single "c=" field at the session level.
>    It MAY contain a single session-level "c=" field and additional "c="
>    field(s) per media description, in which case the per-media values
>    override the session-level settings for the respective media.
>
> No mention of rejected media descriptions, so it applies to all!
>
> Balint
>
>
>
> On 22/10/2014 16:37, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I recently ran into an intro issue with some unknown SIP device. My
>> client uses a per-stream SDP connection line, but when a stream is disabled
>> (port set to 0) the stream is just reduced to the m= line.
>>
>> Technically I could put the connection line at the session level in some
>> cases, but it could be that I need to have it at the stream level. Should I
>> also add it for disabled streams? FWIW, doing so made the aforementioned
>> SIP device happy, but I couldn’t find any RFC reference which stated it’s
>> always required.
>>
>> Any clarification (or recommendation) would be appreciated, thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
>> AG Projects
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to