On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 08:59 -0400, Brett Tate wrote: > If your proposal was intended, I assume that the working group > wouldn't have indicated "from amongst those in the offer" within the > following snippet similar to what it indicates within section 6.1 > paragraph 3. > > RFC 3264 section 8.2: > > "Like the offer, the answer MAY omit all > attributes present previously, and MAY list just a single media > format from amongst those in the offer."
I guess you're right, thanks for pointing this out. At the same time, I don't think that listing a codec (or codecs) that was not present in the offer is likely to cause interoperability problems when the media is rejected (ie. the port is set to 0 in the answer). Best, Jānis _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
