Exactly. First three versions of the individual draft worked with multiple contacts: https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/audet/draft-audet-sip-sips-g uidelines-00.txt https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/audet/draft-audet-sip-sips-g uidelines-01.txt https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/audet/draft-audet-sip-sips-g uidelines-02.txt
Starting from -03 (individual), it shifted to the current model. https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/audet/draft-audet-sip-sips-g uidelines-03.txt And again, with TCP and UDP today, we do NOT use explicit registration. > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 06:42 > To: Hisham Khartabil > Cc: Dean Willis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) > Subject: Re: [Sip] SIPS question: How to prevent plaintext > requests from being delivered to a UA > > Hisham, > > I don't understand how you expect the registering of two > schemes to work. Suppose the phone needs to use outbound. Are > you suggesting that it needs to establish one outbound > connection for sips and a different one for sip? Why would > anyone want to incur that extra cost compared to simply > receiving both sip and sips calls over the same connection? _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
