Thank you. I will make the corrections.

First one should be about request (not necessarily REGISTER, and by
the way, REGISTER is a type of UAS).

The other ones should have not included Require. You are right. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elwell, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 01:25
> To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt
> 
> Francois,
> 
> "If a UAS receives a request with the sips
>    option-tag in a Supported or Require header field and it 
> accepts the
>    registration, it MUST include the sips option-tag in Supported or
>    Require header in a 200 (OK) response."
> A UAS should not receive a REGISTER request - only a 
> registrar should receive such a request.
> 
> "it MUST include the sips option-tag in Supported or
>    Require header in a 200 (OK) response."
> What is the meaning of a Require header field in a response?
> 
> "If a UAC sent a request with a sips option-tag
>    in a Supported header, and the 200 (OK) did not include a sips
>    option-tag in a Require or Supported header,"
> Same comment.
> 
> John 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Francois Audet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 16 April 2007 23:27
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have submitted draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.
> >  
> > I have integrated all the agreements of the Prague meeting. 
> Including 
> > the change to Standards Track draft, and the RFC 2119 
> wording changes, 
> > as well as the restructure of the document with Normative 
> requirements 
> > for UA and Proxy separated. Also the deprecation of the last hop 
> > exception.
> > 
> > I also have attempted to capture the suggestions for 
> improvements and 
> > consensus from the mailing list.
> > 
> > There are two remaining issues that I have documented in Annex C.
> > 
> > Those 2 issues are what we need to focus on:
> > 
> >   1.  Do we deprecate the "last hop retarget upgrade 
> exception"?  The
> >        document currently assumes that it IS deprecated, as this is 
> > the
> >        preference of the author.
> > 
> >   2.  Do we need the sips option tag? The current document assumes 
> > that
> >        we do use the option tag, and that is the preference of the 
> > author.
> >        (There is at least one dissenting voice on that one: Hisham).
> > 
> > Please comment on those two open issues, and use a proper 
> Subject for 
> > the topic.
> > 
> > If you have other comments, please use appropriate Subject 
> fields to 
> > make the thread easier to follow.
> > 
> > Please also not repeat topics that have been beaten to 
> death already.
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 12:50
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt
> > > 
> > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
> Internet-Drafts 
> > > directories.
> > > This draft is a work item of the Session Initiation 
> Protocol Working 
> > > Group of the IETF.
> > > 
> > >   Title           : The use of the SIPS URI Scheme in the 
> > > Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
> > >   Author(s)       : F. Audet
> > >   Filename        : draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt
> > >   Pages           : 54
> > >   Date            : 2007-4-16
> > >   
> > > This document provides clarifications and guidelines 
> concerning the
> > >    use of SIPS URI scheme in the Session Initiation 
> Protocol (SIP).  
> > > It
> > >    also makes normative changes to SIP.  This document also
> > provides a
> > >    discussion of possible future steps in specification.
> > > 
> > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt
> > > 
> > > To remove yourself from the I-D Announcement list, send a 
> message to 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe 
> in the body 
> > > of the message.
> > > You can also visit
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I-D-announce
> > > to change your subscription settings.
> > > 
> > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. 
> Login with the 
> > > username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After 
> > > logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get 
> > > draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt".
> > > 
> > > A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in 
> > > http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or 
> > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> > > 
> > > Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.
> > > 
> > > Send a message to:
> > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > In the body type:
> > >   "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt".
> > >   
> > > NOTE:     The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
> > >   MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
> > >   feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
> > >   command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
> > >   a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant mail 
> > > readers
> > >   exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
> > >   "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split
> > >   up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
> > >   how to manipulate these messages.
> > > 
> > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader 
> > > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the 
> > > Internet-Draft.
> > > 
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to