> >Please also not repeat topics that have been beaten to death already. >
Though I have not seen any ENGINEERING reason coming so far on this. I welcome any light coming even with heat too to enable me cross the HURDLES. IMHO, SIPS has been beaten to death couple of times. I have read very closely couple of times the meeting minutes sent by Dean. It nowhere mentions that it will be adopted as STANDARDS track document. It might be decision in the Prague, but afterwards on the list, I have not seen any UNANIMITY on the list to pursue this as standard track document. Dean himself mentioned that SIPS is LARGELY broken, but we owe the explaination to the community which is using it. So I have still my objection to proceed it as STANDARDS track, where chairs also seem to be aligned. Please correct me, if my interpretation is incorrect. Thx Samir _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
