On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Francois Audet wrote:
2. Do we need the sips option tag? The current document assumes
that
we do use the option tag, and that is the preference of the
author.
(There is at least one dissenting voice on that one: Hisham).
I'm confused on why we would need it and would want to understand why
it is needed before commenting on this. I don't buy the needing it to
enforce deprecate of last hop rule - I see problem in that it leads
to two bits that mean the same thing and we have to deal with all the
corner cases of when they conflict. It also makes me wonder if there
are problems when a URI is copied from one situation to another and
the REquires: sips header is not.
Cullen <with my individual hat on>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
