Paul Kyzivat writes:

 > Sure. But SIP is not HTTP. I realize that in *theory* there could be 
 > lots of targets that only want to use SIPS. But in *practice* where are 
 > those going to come from? In general I want to be able to receive calls 
 > even if the caller is unwilling or unable to use SIPS.

i agree with you and don't see any use for sips.  tls transport, on the
other hand, is useful.  for example, i'm connected to a public wifi AP
and don't want the next guy to see whom i'm calling.  so i'll use sip
uri scheme, but tls transport.  that guarantees that i'm able to reach
my destination even if it only supports sip.

is it so that transport=tls does not exist?  if so, it is plain stupid.

-- juha

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to