Then, only the VIA headers are affected. No impact whatsoever on Record-Route and Request-URI as it is still sip: to sip:
You should really NOT use the transport parameter in RR or Request-URI. But you are right, I probably need to make it more explicit in the text. > -----Original Message----- > From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 09:07 > To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) > Cc: [email protected]; Alan Johnston; Keith Drage; Peterson, Jon; > Dean Willis > Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt: Closing of > Opened issues > > Francois Audet writes: > > > So: to summarize, with the current draft, the double > record-route > procedures are never used. > > thanks for the your interpretation that differs from what i > read earlier on this list. > > in order to make this perfectly clear to proxy implementers, > can someone, please, tell exactly what the proxy should so in > terms of r-r headers and r-uri when request with sip: uri > scheme comes in over udp and goes out over tls. > > -- juha > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
