On Apr 27, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Francois Audet wrote:


Basically, I've used 403 (Forbidden) when a UAC tries to register with the wrong
scheme in the Contact.

And I've used 404 (Not Found) when a UAC sends a non-REGISTER request to a SIP URI when only a SIPS URI exists for that resource. I used to have 403 for that, but I received some comments from somebody on the list that 404 (Not Found) would be more appropriate.

I don't feel strongly about this issue.

If anybody has any ideas, please go ahead.


Nonchair comment:

If we agree that SIP and SIPS point at the same thing, then rejecting a SIP request with a 404 when there is an "equivalent" registration seems wrong. 403 seems better, but what it seems like we need is an "Invalid Scheme" response. I'm also tempted by 488 (Not Acceptable Here) even though we normally use that for SDP.

Even a 400 (Bad Request) seems better than 404.

--
Dean



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to