At 2:09 PM -0700 5/9/07, Dan Wing wrote:
>
>However, if you're sending SDP and SDPng, multipart/mixed does not
>make sense. If you're sending SDP and SDPng, you want the answerer
>to pick one. For the next decade, anyone that understands SDPng
>will also need to continue to understand SDP. And we don't want the
>receiver to creatively use both the SDP offer and the SDPng offer.
>
>Email is similar: if you configure Thunderbird or Outlook to send
>messages with text/plain and text/html they are put inside
>multipart/related, not multipart/mixed.
I totally agree. It seems like multipart/mixed, multipart/alternative,
and possibly multipart/related will be needed for different uses.
regards,
Ted
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
