Hi, Multipart/alternative is interesting. I guess that, for SDP, it could be used to provide different "offer alternatives". I think it would be good to compare it against some of the other grouping/alternative mechanisms we have defined for that purpose.
Regards, Christer > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30. huhtikuuta 2007 19:13 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME > > From: Cullen Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think the WG should consider an update to 3261 (likely > done through > the process Keith has proposed) that makes this multipart/MIME > mandatory to implement. > > I assume that the requirement is that if a message has a > multipart/alternative body, and the UA is capable of > understanding one part of the body, then it must be able to > extract that part and use it to process the message. > > Dale > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
