Agreed. If there had been no comments I would have said that.
What I am trying to do at the moment is persuade all you people out there to get stuff on the list (and start discussing it) before the IETF meeting so we can address those issues before or in the IETF meeting. If necessary, there will then be a revised draft, and we will WGLC that. Regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:16 AM > To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Sip] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-outbound-09.txt > > DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\) writes: > > > We now have a new version of outbound. There hasn't > exactly been a > flurry of comments since it was posted - > does that mean it is now ready > for WGLC. > > there was comment on it by someone from nokia, which made > sense. i don't see a point of making a last call, before > those issues have been dealt with. > > -- juha > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
