DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
(As WG chair)
We now have a new version of outbound. There hasn't exactly been a
flurry of comments since it was posted - does that mean it is now ready
for WGLC.
It has agenda time at the next IETF meeting, with a view to starting
WGLC not long after that meeting. If you believe there are issues with
the current version of this document, then you need to post them to the
list, so that they can be either resolved there, or addressed in the
meeting.
I never received an explanation of what kind of attacks could be avoided
by an edge proxy using an algorithm that generates flow tokens that
"cannot be modified by attackers" (section 5.2 of outbound-09).
This was the last e-mail in the thread the last time I brought it up on
the list :
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg18336.html.
This leads me to think that either
1) the security threats haven't been addressed properly
or
2) that there in fact was no security threat so the requirement for an
edge proxy to generate flows that "cannot be modified by attackers"
is just unnecessary, and should therefor be removed
or
3) there really _is_ something that gets significantly better by this
requirement, and it should simply be explained in the draft.
/Fredrik
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip