Hi, Dan Wing Wrote: > > > > Section 4.1, item about Contact: > > > > > > > > How can the Contact header usefully be used in the > > signing process? An > > > > SBC along the message path will happily replace it. > > > > > > I have removed that in -01 (which isn't yet published, of > > course). There > > > was some thought it was necessary, but I agree it should be removed > > > from the signature. > > > > > > On a similar note, I am considering removing CallId from > > the signature. > > > Oftentimes the Call Id value contains an IP address (in > > dotted decimal > > > or hex), and an SBC or B2BUA may also want to rewrite such > > a CallId. I > > > have made a note of that in -01 so this can be discussed. > > > > I thought about that as well, but apparently I forgot about > > adding it to > > my mail. I think it would be a good idea to take Call-ID out as well. > > Ok, thanks. >
I agree with this, but keep in mind that the call-id serves as a nonce in RFC 4474. It might require introducing a new header/parameter to be the nonce. Regards, Gilad _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
