Hi, >>The CSeq (at least the digit portion) may also be modified, >>for example if there has been some "dialog piggybacked" requests >>sent between the SBC and another entity, but not end-to-end. In >>that case the the SBC may have to increase the CSeq before >>forwarding the request, if the digit portion value has already >>been used in a request sent by the SBC in the same direction. > >That seems like a good opportunity, within that trust domain >between the SBC and the other entity, to use >P-Asserted-Identity.
I am not sure I understand. How could the P-A-I header be used instead of the CSeq? Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
