-----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a. extensive technical review, comments and feedbacks, including commentary from implementors (including one in my own company, and several others from outside of it) and deployers (Tim Moore from Microsoft) FM: While I applaud the time and effort that the large vendors have obviously invested in this, this is a qualitative statement. Perhaps Cisco and/or Microsoft have empirical data they would be willing to share about robustness and performance? I don't think anyone here, including myself, is saying that ICE should not go forward or be used (its ability to handle hairpinning is of great interest for example), we are asking for evidence that we're not going to have another 3489 experience if we can avoid it. e. multiple open source implementations (two have been pointed out already) FM: I think I missed those, can they be repeated? The only one I'm aware of is pjnath and its first release was a little over two months ago and its based on -15. Thanks, FM _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
