This is the way MIME works. Please don't change it!
On 7/18/07 9:44 AM, "Jonathan Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > For multipart/alternative - I don't understand the requirement to order > them from least to most 'rich'. Is that a general MIME behavior or are > we defining it that way? If we want to prioritize, shouldn't we use an > explicit q-value or something? Using order seems like it will be brittle > (as it has been in SDP where m-lines were never numbered). [snip] Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
