Hi Dean,
in ECRIT we assumed that the Request URI contains the service URN. We
put that stuff into the Phone BCP document (which unfortunately still
contains an error I just noticed).
That's what we told the 3GPP in the past as well. Hence, they wrote it
in their specs. See TS 24.229, Section 5.1.6.8.3, bullet (1).
Within the ECRIT group we weren't aware that this issue has not been
decided and hence we are a bit concerned about the recent change given
that other SDOs followed our suggestion already.
Do you have an idea what we should do now?
Ciao
Hannes
Dean Willis wrote:
Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
No response received -- resend.
Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Dear SIP WG members,
during the ECRIT meeting we learned that the SIP working group
"rejected" the concept described in
draft-rosenberg-sip-ua-loose-route-01.txt.
Could someone please give us more information about this decision as
it impacts the work we do in ECRIT?
I wouldn't say that UA Loose Route was "rejected" so much as "does not
yet have consensus".
This is in part influenced by "WG doesn't seem to have a compelling
reason to make such a significant change."
Perhaps ECRIT has a compelling reason?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
