Hi Christer,

Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF) wrote:
Hi,

In 3GPP, it is true that the UE inserts the service URN into the
Request-URI.

But, in the current specification the E-CSCF converts the URN into a
routable PSAP address, i.e. the mechanism in the loose-route draft is
not used.

Why was this done? Do you expect that the call uses a different emergency call marking technique went it enters the PSAP operator network? Do you expect that the call is directly sent from the E-CSCF to the PSAP and that there are no other hops in between?

Regards,

Christer

Ciao
Hannes


-----Original Message-----
From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. syyskuuta 2007 22:59
To: Dean Willis
Cc: IETF SIP List; ECRIT
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Re: [Sip] draft-rosenberg-sip-ua-loose-route-01.txt

Hi Dean,

in ECRIT we assumed that the Request URI contains the service URN. We put that stuff into the Phone BCP document (which unfortunately still contains an error I just noticed). That's what we told the 3GPP in the past as well. Hence, they wrote it in their specs. See TS 24.229, Section 5.1.6.8.3, bullet (1).

Within the ECRIT group we weren't aware that this issue has not been decided and hence we are a bit concerned about the recent change given that other SDOs followed our suggestion already.

Do you have an idea what we should do now?

Ciao
Hannes


Dean Willis wrote:
Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
No response received -- resend.

Hannes Tschofenig wrote:

Dear SIP WG members,

during the ECRIT meeting we learned that the SIP working group "rejected" the concept described in draft-rosenberg-sip-ua-loose-route-01.txt.

Could someone please give us more information about this
decision as
it impacts the work we do in ECRIT?
I wouldn't say that UA Loose Route was "rejected" so much
as "does not
yet have consensus".

This is in part influenced by "WG doesn't seem to have a compelling reason to make such a significant change."

Perhaps ECRIT has a compelling reason?

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip




_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to