Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
The key point here is that NOTIFY will inherently be associated with an
event package, which provides enough information for the recipient to
know what to do with the body. INFO, lacking such information, is
ambiguous. And, as before, the hardest problem isn't interpreting what
is sent to you; it is indicating what *can* be sent to you.
Sure, but we could (if we had to) define the same concept for INFO as
sub-not has in that regard.
Which is what. I've been saying. This. Whole. Time.
Perhaps the confusion here arises because I've _also_ been pointing out
why this is Bad Idea for a _different_ set of reasons (which are
admittedly more philosophical than practical), but at least it makes the
INFO situation tenable.
/a
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
