Hi, >I am probably misunderstanding, but I thought Paul's answer >was that if a proxy goes into business for itself, it's not >really a proxy, and if a proxy goes into business for itself, >that's not because we took this mode of operation into >account, but because the people who built this "proxy" were >able to make it completely transparent, so that we didn't >need to take this mode of operation into account.
My understanding from what Paul said was that a dialog-stateful proxy is still a proxy. Whether in real life people add lots of other stuff to dialog-stateful proxies, so they become B2BUAs, I don't know, but a "pure" dialog-stateful proxy is still a proxy. Regards, Christer > > Paul, back to you if I got this wrong. > > Spencer > > From: "Christer Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Paul Kyzivat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi Paul, > > So, I guess the compact version of your answer to my question > is: "I am not sure" :) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
