Hi, Keith (and Dean),
I'm not sure from point 2 whether you saw
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg20844.html or not (if
not, that's perfectly understandable, because of the INFOblast on this
mailing list).
I have read the draft from one end to the other. I am happy with the overall
structure. I did have one question for the SIP working group about how
Jonathan might be able to point to future essential corrections in this
document. That question should not be blocking for request-to-publish.
Thanks,
Spencer
----- Original Message -----
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "IETF SIP List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 7:38 AM
Subject: [Sip] RE: WGLC of draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-03
(As WG chair)
There has been little response to this WGLC so far. So:
1) A REMINDER TO ALL SIP WG MEMBERS THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS UNDER
WGLC. It is your duty to review it and post comments. Please do so by
Monday 29th October.
2) An explicit request that at least one member of the SIP WG has
read it from one end to the other, so that we know whether we are happy
with the overall structure. If you have done this, and are happy (i.e.
no comments at all), then please inform the WG chairs of this.
3) An explicit request to all editor's of published SIP (and
SIPPING) RFCs. If you have the honour to have published an RFC, please
review the entry for your document, and make sure it makes sense. If it
doesn't, please comment.
Regards
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 9:32 AM
To: IETF SIP List
Subject: WGLC of draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-03
(As WG chair)
This is to announce a working group last call of
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers
-guide-03.txt
I would request comments on this document be made (to list
and to author mentioned in the document) by Monday October 29th 2007.
Please clearly identify the text of the document that is
being commented on, the nature of the comment (NIT, minor
technical, major technical, etc), and any suggested
resolution, even if it is only some alternatives.
Regards
Keith
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
