(As WG chair) This WGLC is now concluded.
I believe we are still awaiting an RAI review from Brian Stucker (apologies if I have missed it). If there are any more comments in preparation, then please get them submitted as soon as possible. >From my review of the comments so far, I believe that the document has been adequately reviewed, and that the comments made are all resolvable. I would therefore ask that the editor update the document and submit a new version, contacting the mailing list if necessary with issues, and we'll get the publication request in for the document. Regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:38 PM > To: IETF SIP List > Subject: [Sip] RE: WGLC of draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-03 > > (As WG chair) > > There has been little response to this WGLC so far. So: > > 1) A REMINDER TO ALL SIP WG MEMBERS THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS UNDER > WGLC. It is your duty to review it and post comments. Please > do so by Monday 29th October. > > 2) An explicit request that at least one member of the SIP WG has > read it from one end to the other, so that we know whether we > are happy with the overall structure. If you have done this, > and are happy (i.e. > no comments at all), then please inform the WG chairs of this. > > 3) An explicit request to all editor's of published SIP (and > SIPPING) RFCs. If you have the honour to have published an > RFC, please review the entry for your document, and make sure > it makes sense. If it doesn't, please comment. > > Regards > > Keith > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 9:32 AM > > To: IETF SIP List > > Subject: WGLC of draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-03 > > > > (As WG chair) > > > > This is to announce a working group last call of > > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers > > -guide-03.txt > > > > I would request comments on this document be made (to list and to > > author mentioned in the document) by Monday October 29th 2007. > > > > Please clearly identify the text of the document that is being > > commented on, the nature of the comment (NIT, minor > technical, major > > technical, etc), and any suggested resolution, even if it > is only some > > alternatives. > > > > Regards > > > > Keith > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
