Paul Kyzivat wrote:
I agree with you on this. And yet people keep using all these different things for DTMF, with KPML apparently last in the running.
DTMF provides a powerful cautionary tale, but it wasn't the point I was trying to make. If we encourage two ways to do things (INFO and NOTIFY) for future event packages, this problem will spread beyond DTMF, into a variety of new specifications.
So, to make sure I understand what you're agreeing with me on: are you specifically agreeing that the arguments I'm making point to needing separate namespaces for event packages and INFO packages?
/a _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
