Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
... would that be an acceptable compromise?
Sure.
OK; good.
BTW, out of curiosity, I thought at some point in the past there was
an email saying that for UA's, sip-outbound would be the only draft
for explicit connect-reuse behavior. So that this draft was really
for proxies, not UA's. Not true? (not that such use would be
enforced in any way, just that the focus had changed)
True, after outbound came into the picture, connect-reuse has
been relegated mostly to proxies. Although, as Dale accurately
observed, the draft tends "to discuss multiple user agents and proxies,
when the entirety of the mechanism can be described by considering
only the two SIP agents at the ends of the connection."
We could nail a line in the sand and make this more concrete (i.e.,
use between proxies only.) Or we could take a middle road and allow
implementors who have reflective connectivity between a UA and a
(proxy) server use connect-reuse. So far, the draft has been taking
the middle road.
Thoughts?
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
