Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
This looks like a good document and definitely something that is in the category of an essential correction. My only comment is that I think there is also an issue with v6 URI equality that we need to fix, and may as well wrap that into a single v6 essential correction.
Jonathan: Can you elaborate on the v6 URI equality fix? Are you referring to the one Brett raised about the equivalence of sip:[::ffff:192.0.2.128] and sip:[::ffff:c000:280]? If so, we have decided to include it in this v6 essential correction.
Nits: Missing period at end of abstract
Will add in. Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org} WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
