Yes, that was the one I was talking about.
-Jonathan R.
Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
This looks like a good document and definitely something that is in
the category of an essential correction. My only comment is that I
think there is also an issue with v6 URI equality that we need to fix,
and may as well wrap that into a single v6 essential correction.
Jonathan: Can you elaborate on the v6 URI equality fix? Are you
referring to the one Brett raised about the equivalence of
sip:[::ffff:192.0.2.128] and sip:[::ffff:c000:280]?
If so, we have decided to include it in this v6 essential correction.
Nits:
Missing period at end of abstract
Will add in.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 499 Thornall St.
Cisco Fellow Edison, NJ 08837
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
