> -----Original Message----- > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:33 > To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) > Cc: [email protected]; Elwell, John; Paul Kyzivat; DRAGE,Keith (Keith) > Subject: RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters > to UAS via proxy > > >The Target seems identical to the To header field. > > I don't think they are identical. Jonathan's draft describes > the issues with using the To header.
Well, your description of "Target" in your draft is indentical to the description of the "To" header. What Jonathan describes as limitations of "To" is that it doesn't reflect any "retargeting". I think what you meant by Target was more the "Current" target as opposed to the Initiatl Target. And if that's the case, then I don't see why it is different from P-Called-ID (although I might be missing something with what the P-Called_ID is supposed to be). _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
