Hi, >>>The Target seems identical to the To header field. >> >>I don't think they are identical. Jonathan's draft describes the >>issues with using the To header. > >Well, your description of "Target" in your draft is >indentical to the description of the "To" header. > >What Jonathan describes as limitations of "To" is that it >doesn't reflect any "retargeting". > >I think what you meant by Target was more the "Current" >target as opposed to the Initiatl Target.
Yes, and I think I did say that futher down in my previous reply :) >And if that's the case, then I don't see why it is different >from P-Called-ID (although I might be missing something with >what the P-Called_ID is supposed to be). I will get back to you on this one. I am writing this e-mail from my home machine, so I don't have all the documents etc. Regards, Christer > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
