Hadriel, Thanks for this draft. One comments:
When talking about changing the host part of SIP URIs, are you referring just to SIP URIs containing an E.164 number in telephone-subscriber format (e.g.: [EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone)? Or are you also talking about other forms of URI that look like E.164 number (e.g., [EMAIL PROTECTED])? Presumably you are not talking about email style URIs. John > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Hadriel Kaplan > Sent: 18 February 2008 20:20 > To: IETF SIP List > Subject: [Sip] New I-D on why From/To-URIs are changed at > provider borders > > As part of an off-line discussion regarding Kai Fischer's > draft on e2e-security-media and whether his From-URI copying > tactic would succeed or not at a policy level, if rfc4474 > fails to do so, I gave my 2 cents on what some providers had > been telling me. Dan asked me to write up a draft on it, in > case people are interested. This is the draft: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kaplan-sip-uris-chan > ge-00.txt > > -hadriel > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
