Cullen Jennings wrote: > > Hmm, you might be reading slightly too much into this thread.
Cullen: In the words of a British ITV sitcom character I used to watch as a kid, "A thousand apologies, please!" (beer in Dublin for the first correct guess) More serious stuff inline... > I think the summary of the thread from my point of view is simply > > As an individual contributor, I'm sending you comment which amounts to > > 1) I think it is good to keep domain-cert and sip-eku as separate drafts > 2) I would suggest changing [...] OK; noted these two points. > My implication that domain-certs might become an essential correction > was clearly wrong and should just be ignored. OK; with the essential corrections bit out of the way, we have made some progress from where we started off when we had our initial phone conference on this back in Nov/Dec 2007. The guidance back then was split the drafts and have domain-certs proceed as Informational. The drafts were split soon after. The drafts can proceed in the split format with the changes noted above (speaking for myself here as 1/2 of the editor team -- I have not conversed with Scott yet.) However, we need to now converge on which track to put domain-certs on: Info, BCP, or PS? Both Scott and I believe that it should be at least BCP, if not PS; and others that reviewed the draft also assumed it was PS. What would be the best way to close this one administrative issue so we can submit the revised drafts accordingly: list discussion or phone conference? If the latter, I can send email out to the chairs, you, Scott and me, and any interested list participants to converge on a time and date. Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org} WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
