On Mar 21, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Dean Willis wrote: > > On Mar 21, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote: >> >> Dean - this conversation is beyond bizarre. In no way do I want to >> write requirements that are in conflict with 3280 or a system that >> implements it. I don't think anything I said should be construed >> that way. Obviously I-D.sip-eku[9] fully depends on 3280. > > Well that's good, because the wording of your previous proposal was > misleading into thinking otherwise. > > The question as I understand it: to what extent does draft-ietf-sip- > domain-certs depend on sip-eku and transitively on 3280? > > I really want this answered clearly in the domain certs draft. > > I'd also like the answer to this question to be agreeable to the > working group. So far, there seems to be some disagreement on the > answer to this question between you and the authors of the domain- > certs draft. There may or may not be any disagreement, as the > appearance of disagreement may stem from a miscommunication. > > The best way I know to do that is by paraphrasing and restating the > proposal until we have something we agree is clear. > > Then you and Scott and Vijay can argue about whether or not you > agree with it. > > -- > Dean
Yep, agree, I send a new proposal (with your wording - thank you). And Vijay, Scott, and the rest of the WG can decide what they think of it. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
