On this thread I would like to explore what can be done in terms of avoiding the issues concerned with RFC 4474 and E.164-based SIP URIs by migration towards the use of email-style URIs. E.164-based URIs will still be needed, particularly for interworking with PSTN but also in those SIP environments where E.164 numbers are more easily handled (e.g., phones with number-based user interfaces). But perhaps we can explore more the possibility of using the two forms in parallel, e.g., E.164-based in PAI (e.g., as TEL URI) and email-style in From. I know Dan has an interesting straw man on this topic, which I will allow him to present himself.
John _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
