Juha Heinanen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > OK, so we have several different URIs, sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone,
> > which are understood to be equivalent to tel:1234 and also to each
> > other
>
> this is not true.
>
I was wondering about that... it sure doesn't seem to me that they're
the same thing at all because I have control of my sip: name space and
if I manufacture e.164-like addresses that's nobody's business but mine.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
