> -----Original Message----- > From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 7:48 AM > To: Dan Wing > Cc: [email protected]; 'Elwell, John' > Subject: Re: [Sip] Migration from E.164 to email-style SIP URIs > > Dan Wing writes: > > > On an outgoing request containing an e164-style URI in the From: > > (or PAI, as you prefer), the domain additionally places the user's > > email-style URI into a new header (let's call it "email-identity"). > > It determines the mapping between a user's E.164 URI and email URI > > using a flat database (example: +14085551234 -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > > my proxy is currently is using P-Preferred-Identity header for that > purpose. why is a new header needed?
The header, containing the email-style URI, needs to be signed. I do not care if it is a new header or not, but I see value in not overloading a header with an already-defined semantic (such as P-Preferred-Identity). But this is a detail. -d _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
