Juha, In fact, it is probably a combination, e.g., mandating on receipt and recommending on send. One thing that perhaps should be mandatory is being able to handle tel received in a 302. Sending tel in a 302 should not be more than a recommendation.
John > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Juha Heinanen > Sent: 15 April 2008 17:39 > To: Dean Willis > Cc: SIP IETF; Francois Audet; Paul Kyzivat; Dan WING > Subject: Re: [Sip] E.164 - who owns it > > Dean Willis writes: > > > > I have no problem with us recommending Tel URI usage for > this, and > > > hoping that implementations will catch-up. > > > > Same here. > > "recommending" is not enough. support for tel uris must be made > mandatory. as i said, if there is a somewhere an rfc3261 bug > list, this > belongs there. > > -- juha > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
